Skip to content

Competitive Cycles

Read the original post ↗

An interesting argument from Marc Andreessen on some comparatively neglected dynamics of tech competition (selective extracts):

1/Cycle time compression may be the most underestimated force in determining winners & losers in tech.

— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) June 3, 2014

6/Second clear instance of cycle time compression: Product improvement & customer upgrade cycles for phones vs TVs and cars.

— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) June 3, 2014

7/Consumers can upgrade their phones every 1-2 years, vs TVs at 5-8 years? Cars at 10-12 years? With phones improving by leaps & bounds.

— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) June 3, 2014

9/Implication: TVs and cars will become accessories for phones, not the other way around. And already happening: Airplay, Chromecast.

— Marc Andreessen (@pmarca) June 3, 2014

It seems to follow from this argument that competitive forces drive product cycles in the direction of compression, and thus techno-economic acceleration. Industries with the shortest technonomic wavelength (highest frequency) ascend to dominance, draining resources from relatively retarded sectors, and re-setting the social pulse to ever greater speeds.

ADDED: Andreessen’s “tweet essays” integrated for convenient reading.